Asus Rog Strix Gtx 1070 Laptop
Asus ROG Strix GL504 Scar Ii (i7-8750H, GTX 1070, FHD) Laptop Review
Meteor With the ROG Strix GL504, Asus introduces a fifteen-inch high-end notebook that brings almost all the features you could wish for in a gaming platform. A 144-Hz panel? Cheque. Thin display bezel? Check. RGB keyboard? Check. Hexa-cadre CPU and DirectX-12 GPU? Check. We explain in our test why this is all the same non quite sufficient for a "very good" evaluation.
"Thin bezels!" There is hardly another fizz give-and-take that is currently as present as this. While Idiot box's and desktop monitors accept already had particularly thin bezels for years, this trend is established in laptops merely now. Afterward some all-rounders such as theDell XPS 15 introduced the tendency, there are now likewise more than and more gaming notebooks that that please united states with their edge-to-edge designs. Here we should mention the Razer Blade 15, theGigabyte Aero 15X v8, theMSI GS65 8RF, and theSchenker XMG Neo fifteen, which will all accompany united states through this test.
Equally one of the largest PC manufacturers in the earth, ASUS is naturally also post-obit the current tendency, presenting a respective 15-inch product with the ROG Strix GL504. To attract as many gamers equally possible, the laptop is available in two dissimilar variants. For i, there is the Hero II, whose specially marked QWER keys are supposed to attract MOBA fans. Then there is likewise the Scar 2 that we tested, which is distinguished by a camouflage pattern and emphasizes the WASD surface area which is of import for ego-shooters.
| Model | GL504GM | GL504GS |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Cadre i7-8750H or Cadre i5-8300H | Core i7-8750H or Core i5-8300H |
| Graphics card | GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB GDDR5) | GeForce GTX 1070 (8 GB GDDR5) |
| RAM | 32 GB DDR4-2666 max. | 32 GB DDR4-2666 max. |
| Storage | 128-512 GB SSD + i TB HDD/SSHD | 128-512 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD/SSHD |
| Display | 144 Hz Full-Hard disk drive IPS | 144 Hz Total-HD IPS |
| G-Sync | no | no |
| Optimus | yes | no |
| Power supply | 180 Watts | 230 Watts |
To give gamers their coin's worth, there are but loftier-end components inside the case. Those who splurge on the top model volition non only receive a Core i7-8750H, but also a GeForce GTX 1070. A 144-Hz display frequency, up to 32 GB DDR4-RAM, and a combination of NVMe-SSD and SSHD reinforce the claims of luxury. Will the GL504 be able to take hold of the crown among the thin-bezel gaming notebooks? We volition observe out.
Retention
32768 MB
, 2x 16 GB Then-DIMM DDR4-2666, all slots occupied, 32 GB max
Display
xv.60 inch 16:nine, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, Total-HD, 144 Hz, glossy: no
Storage
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, 512 GB
, NVMe + Seagate FireCuda ST1000LX015, 1 TB SSHD, 5400 rpm. Slots: 1x M.2 Type 2280 + 1x 2.v in
Weight
2.456 kg ( = 86.63 oz / 5.41 pounds), Power Supply: 613 g ( = 21.62 oz / 1.35 pounds)
Note: The manufacturer may apply components from different suppliers including brandish panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Compared to the previous generation, a lot has changed in terms of the instance. As well equally the size and design, the surface blueprint has also been reworked. The top of the case is even graced past ii dissimilar textures. Whether you like the camouflage visuals of the Scar edition or not is a matter of taste. Our impression is that at start glance, yous could mistake some spots for chipped-off varnish from some angles. The foreign blueprint mixture also extends to the bottom of the case which, corresponding to the C-encompass, is "only" made of plastic. The lid, on the other paw, is made from brushed metal, giving it above-boilerplate sturdiness. The base unit is as well quite robust and tin only exist bent or pushed in by using a significant amount of force.
Due to the condition of our examination unit of measurement as a pre-production sample, we cannot give any final comments on the workmanship nonetheless. Our test unit was quite convincing in this regard, however. Nice: not only should some illumination fetishists be pleased wth the RGB keyboard, but besides with a multi-colored LED strip in the notebook front. Withal as already mentioned, the main highlight is still the very slim bezel, provided you condone the bottom segment, which is often noticeably smaller in the competitors.
Apropos, "slim": While at a summit of 2.vi cm (~i in) the GL504 appears to exist very slim compared to conventional gaming notebooks, it does not come close to the skinniness of the Razer Blade 15 (17 mm/~0.66 in), the MSI GS65 (18 mm/~0.vii in), the Gigabyte Aero 15X (eighteen mm/~0.7 in), or the Schenker XMG Neo 15 (22 mm/~0.ix in). Things wait like with the weight, where y'all can yet send 2.v kg (~5.five lb) in relative comfort, but the competitors are much lighter at 1.8 - 2.1 kg (~4 - iv.6 lb).
This is not surprising, considering that Asus forgoes Nvidia'due south Max-Q technology, which is suggested particularly for very compact devices. We also practice not really understand the conclusion against Nvidia'south Optimus graphics switching (this concerns just the GTX-1070 version), particularly since there is no G-Sync on lath either. The hinges on the GL504 make a good impression. Fifty-fifty though they are quite strong, the base unit of measurement does not move when opening the lid. Surface vibrations only crusade the lid to wobble to a limited extent.
❌
Connections
As up-to-date as the GL504 is in many respects, at that place would still be room for comeback in terms of the connections. Fifty-fifty though ii of the full of four USB ports back up the 3.ane-Gen2 protocol, nosotros are looking in vain for Thunderbolt 3 to use external GPUs and other peripherals. The balance of the connections follow the gaming standard and include an RJ45 port, an audio port (combined headphones/microphone), a card reader, and an opening for Kensington Locks. You tin can connect desktop monitors via either HDMI ii.0 or Mini-DisplayPort 1.ii.
The positioning of the connections specially do good correct-handed users. Since most of the ports are gathered on the left side, a mouse plugged into the correct side has lots of room to move.
At 79-82 MB/s, the performance of the card reader settles between that of the Gigabyte Aero 15X which is two-3 times every bit fast (191-242 MB/s) and the much slower Schenker XMG Neo 15 (25-32 MB/south). The MSI GS65 and the Razer Blade xv must practice without a card reader and are therefore missing from the placement.
There are inappreciably any differences between the comparison devices in the wireless communication. With the exception of the Gigabyte Aero 15X which has a slightly-aging wireless module, all the thin-bezel gaming notebooks offer very current Wi-Fi adapters from Rivet Networks or Intel. Likewise the Killer Wireless-Air conditioning 1550, the Wireless-Ac 9260 and 9560 as well achieve top-notch values. In our WLAN test (1 meter/~3 ft altitude to the Linksys EA8500 reference router), nearly of the devices achieve close to the 700-Mbit mark.
As we are accustomed from Asus, the system includes a large number of various tools that are all bundled in the well-known Gaming Center. While GameVisual handles the brandish output, Aura is responsible for the keyboard illumination and the LED strip. The sound tin can be adjusted extensively via Sonic Studio and Sonic Rader. Naturally for the aristocracy in 2018, a fan control is also included. Nosotros are using the Balanced mode for our tests, and in the Silent and Overboost modes, the measurements tin vary significantly.
The accessories included with our evaluation sample are limited to a key concatenation and various stickers. As a power supply for the GTX-1070 version, Asus includes a 230-watt model (180 watts for the GTX 1060) that weighs about 0.6 kg (~1.iii lb) and measures xvi.v x 7.5 x 3 cm (~half-dozen.v x 3 x ane.two in).
In terms of the maintenance, there are no big surprises. After yous accept removed all the Philips screws from the D-cover, you tin completely remove the bottom plate (for which yous will demand a apartment prying tool, however). Nether the hood, you can find not only the wireless module and the bombardment, only as well 2 DDR4-RAM banks, i Yard.2 slot of Type 2280, and one 2.v-inch slot. The cooling system consists of 2 fans that are connected with several heat pipes.
Keyboard
The input devices exercise not need to hide behind the competitors at all. Unlike some other Asus laptops whose keyboards feel a fleck spongy (look at the G752, for example), the keyboard in the ROG Strix feels quite crisp and tight, which ensures a loftier accuracy. Whether you tin appreciate the transparent WASD area is a matter of your personal tastes. Cheers to its bright lettering and the configurable RGB illumination, the keyboard stands out regardless, be it 24-hour interval or dark.
The manufacturer also deserves some credit for the practical special keys which allow yous to suit the volume, deactivate the microphone, and open the Gaming Center. Since our test unit of measurement is a United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland version, we cannot offer a terminal evaluation on the (German) layout however. We can definitely give some praise for the separated Arrow keys and the enlarged Enter fundamental. Only the combined Insert/Delete central stood out as a negative betoken to the author. Despite the limited space, Asus has still managed to fit a dedicated number block, although its keys turned out quite small.
Touchpad
For the touchpad, the manufacturer uses a classic variant with "real" mouse keys. Although the surface is very smooth, the sliding characteristics could have been better, particularly with moist or greasy fingers. In terms of the multi-touch on support, at that place are hardly any reasons for complaint. Ii finger gestures such equally zooming or scrolling work generally smoothly. The precision is also camouflaged to a large extent.
The dimensions of the touchpad are on a typical fifteen-inch level, and 10.7 x 5.nine cm (four.two x 2.three in) are neither particularly large, nor particularly small-scale. Withal, Asus should improve on the noise of the mouse keys, which although sounding well divers, also make quite a clatter and are much louder than the keyboard.
While Razer, Gigabyte, and Schenker trust the 144-Hz displays from LG Philips (LGD05C0), Asus is using a console from AU Optronics for the GL504, whose label is slightly unlike from the brandish of the MSI GS65 (B156HAN08.two instead of B156HAN08.0).
| 238 cd/m² | 252 cd/m² | 247 cd/m² | ||
| 257 cd/m² | 271 cd/m² | 266 cd/m² | ||
| 265 cd/m² | 278 cd/m² | 276 cd/grand² | ||
Distribution of brightness
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED)
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 278 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 261.1 cd/k² Minimum: 29 cd/m²
Effulgence Distribution: 86 %
Eye on Bombardment: 271 cd/m²
Contrast: 847:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.61 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.3, calibrated: 2.33
ΔE Greyscale 1.97 | 0.64-98 Ø5.v
90% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.half-dozen.three 3D)
66% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.ii.0 3D)
66.4% Display P3 (Argyll two.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.four
| Asus GL504GS AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | Razer Blade 15 2018 LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080 | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080 | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | Schenker XMG Neo 15 LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brandish | 0% | -1% | 1% | 0% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.4 | 64.3 -3% | 63.half dozen -4% | 66.two 0% | 64.3 -3% |
| sRGB Coverage | 90.2 | 93.7 4% | 93.8 iv% | 92.ane 2% | 94.i iv% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66 | 65.5 -one% | 64.nine -2% | 67.2 2% | 65.3 -i% |
| Response Times | -88% | -80% | -95% | -66% | |
| Response Fourth dimension Gray l% / Grey 80% * | seven.2 ? | 17.2 ? -139% | 16.eight ? -133% | 17.half-dozen ? -144% | sixteen ? -122% |
| Response Fourth dimension Black / White * | 8.8 ? | 12 ? -36% | xi.2 ? -27% | 12.8 ? -45% | 9.6 ? -nine% |
| PWM Frequency | |||||
| Screen | 2% | 21% | 11% | 8% | |
| Effulgence middle | 271 | 290 7% | 313 15% | 254 -half-dozen% | 325 20% |
| Brightness | 261 | 281 8% | 300 15% | 262 0% | 303 16% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 82 -5% | 78 -nine% | 89 3% | ninety five% |
| Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.3 six% | 0.33 -three% | 0.22 31% | 0.33 -three% |
| Contrast | 847 | 967 14% | 948 12% | 1155 36% | 985 16% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | two.61 | ii.85 -9% | 1.29 51% | 2.37 9% | ii.69 -three% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.93 | 6.27 -27% | 2.04 59% | iv.71 four% | four.91 -0% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | ii.33 | i.39 40% | ane.84 21% | one.27 45% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.97 | 2.iv -22% | 0.69 65% | 1.58 20% | 2.34 -19% |
| Gamma | 2.iv 92% | ii.34 94% | two.43 91% | 2.48 89% | two.38 92% |
| CCT | 6398 102% | 6718 97% | 6550 99% | 6785 96% | 6872 95% |
| Color Space (Percentage of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59 | threescore 2% | 60 2% | 60 2% | 60 2% |
| Colour Space (Percentage of sRGB) | ninety | 94 4% | 94 4% | 92 2% | 94 4% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -29% / -x% | -20% / 3% | -28% / -4% | -nineteen% / -3% |
* ... smaller is better
In terms of its response time, the Asus laptop is manner ahead. 7.ii ms gray-to-gray is an fantabulous value that leaves the competitors in the dust. The ROG Strix does not commit whatever blunders in the other disciplines either. Okay, the contrast (847:1) and the brightness (261 cd/m²) could have been a lilliputian higher, but the image still appears quite vibrant and - cheers to the calibration by the manufacturer - very natural.
From a gamer's point of view, the color space is also respectable. 90% sRGB and 59% AdobeRGB should exist sufficient for most buyers. Every bit is known for IPS panels, the viewing angle stability is also right. In a TN panel, the image would appear distorted significantly faster with steeper viewing angles, particularly in the vertical range.
Some other positive is that there is no flickering of the screen (for case, due to PWM) according to our measurements. We did see some screen bleeding in our exam unit of measurement, even though it was rather subdued.
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to modify from 1 colour to the next. Deadening response times can pb to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
| ↔ Response Time Blackness to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.iv ms ascension |  |
| ↘ 4.iv ms autumn | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparing, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » fourteen % of all devices are amend. This means that the measured response fourth dimension is improve than the average of all tested devices (23 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Fourth dimension 50% Greyness to 80% Grey | ||
| 7.2 ms ... rise ↗ and autumn ↘ combined | ↗ three.8 ms rising |  |
| ↘ 3.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should exist very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » ten % of all devices are ameliorate. This means that the measured response fourth dimension is ameliorate than the average of all tested devices (36.3 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human heart. If said frequency is too depression, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or fifty-fifty discover the flickering altogether.
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
| In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the brandish. If PWM was detected, an average of 19773 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Regardless of whether information technology comes with the GeForce GTX 1060 and Core i5-8300H or the GeForce GTX 1070 and Core i7-8750H, the ROG Strix GL504 settles comfortably in the loftier-end segment. While with 32 GB of RAM and an SSD-SSHD philharmonic, our test configuration is also well-equipped otherwise, sixteen GB of RAM and a combination of SSD and HDD would fare similarly well or identically in the benchmarks, so this does not necessarily have to be the top model.
Since virtually of the 3D applications are GPU limited, the Cadre i5-8300H quad-cadre processor should actually be sufficient for your perfect gaming enjoyment. On the other hand, yous become the all-time future proofing with the Core i7-8750H hexa-core chip, which is able to run upwards to 12 threads in parallel via Hyper-Threading (compared to viii threads for the i5-8300H). At 9 MB compared to viii MB, the amount of L3 caches is also higher than that of the more affordable Coffee-Lake sibling. The same goes for the clock speed. Instead of a maximum of 4.0 GHz, the Core i7-8750H reaches up to 4.1 GHz, at least in single-core load.
The GL504 does well in the benchmarks. In Cinebench R15 too as Cinebench R11.5, the fifteen-incher is ahead of the competitors in the multi-cadre test. Despite having the aforementioned CPU, the altitude is often more than than ten%.
Yet, the Cadre i7-8750H is only able to maintain its high performance level for a short period of time. In our Cinebench loop which lasts at to the lowest degree for xxx minutes, the clock speed dropped from 3.9 to only iii.3 GHz afterward a while, reducing the operation by well-nigh 15%. The aforementioned behavior can be observed in numerous Java-Lake notebooks.
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Fleck
Cinebench R11.five CPU Single 64Bit
i.92 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
13.26 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Unmarried 64Bit
170 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1190 Points
Help
The arrangement performance depends strongly on the selected configuration. The elevation model of the GL504 with a Core i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070, 32 GB of RAM, and a 512-GB SSD is able to reach beginning (Home Score) or 2nd place (Work Score) in the PCMark eight benchmarks. The results in the PCMark 10 are a piddling surprising. While 4854 points are good, the competitors can gain a few points more than.
| PCMark 10 - Score | |
| Average of course Gaming (4477 - 8426, n=182, final ii years) | |
| Schenker XMG Neo fifteen | |
| MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
| Razer Blade 15 2018 | |
| Asus GL504GS | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Asus GL504GS | |
| Boilerplate of class Gaming (3561 - 6657, due north=52, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
| Razer Blade fifteen 2018 | |
| Schenker XMG Neo 15 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
| Piece of work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Average of class Gaming (4380 - 7104, north=52, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
| Asus GL504GS | |
| Schenker XMG Neo xv | |
| Razer Bract fifteen 2018 | |
| MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
| PCMark 8 Habitation Score Accelerated v2 | 5390 points | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5673 points | |
| PCMark ten Score | 4854 points | |
| Help | ||
Windows 10 is running on a modern PCIe drive. The 512-GB SSD integrated in our test unit comes from Samsung and–call back the MSI GS65– goes by the proper noun "PM981."
Judging from the AS SSD benchmark, the M.ii model offers a very adept performance which is similar to that of the in-house Samsung PM961 (Razer Blade fifteen). The Samsung 970 Pro of the Schenker XMG Neo 15 is able to move slightly ahead, while the Gigabyte Aero 15X noticeably falls behind, due to the weaker Toshiba SSD. Subjectively, the differences are modest, and the devices are quite similar in Windows everyday life.
| Asus GL504GS Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Razer Blade fifteen 2018 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Schenker XMG Neo xv Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As SSD | -6% | -31% | -7% | xiii% | |
| Seq Read | 1837 | 2376 29% | 2213 20% | 1266 -31% | 1915 4% |
| Seq Write | 1730 | 1521 -12% | 1163 -33% | 1834 six% | 2324 34% |
| 4K Read | 53.3 | 46.45 -13% | 23.36 -56% | 48.94 -8% | 48.03 -10% |
| 4K Write | 105.7 | 93.6 -eleven% | lxxx.4 -24% | 107.2 1% | 106 0% |
| Score Read | 1542 | 1584 3% | 1092 -29% | 1346 -13% | 1837 19% |
| Score Write | 1983 | 1450 -27% | 939 -53% | 2051 3% | 2423 22% |
| Score Total | 4318 | 3806 -12% | 2536 -41% | 4122 -v% | 5224 21% |
CDM 5/half dozen Read Seq Q32T1: 2738 MB/s
CDM 5/vi Write Seq Q32T1: 1864 MB/south
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 344.2 MB/south
CDM five/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 297.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1761 MB/s
CDM v Write Seq: 1852 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 41.23 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 97.ix MB/s
Sequential Read: 1837MB/s
Sequential Write: 1730MB/south
Admission Time Read: 0.049ms
Access Fourth dimension Write: 0.035ms
Perchance the decision on the graphics carte might be the hardest. Those who are willing to lower the graphics quality settings if necessary and are not planning to connect a WQHD or 4K monitor should be happy with the GeForce GTX 1060. Nvidia'southward DirectX-12 model from the Pascal series has 1280 shader units and half dozen GB of GDDR5-VRAM.
On the other manus, core gamers who ever want to play in maximum detail and perchance desire to connect an external monitor with a higher resolution than 1920x1080 should go for the more expensive GeForce GTX 1070. Nvidia provides this with 2048 shader units and viii GB of GDDR5-VRAM.
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 17775 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 36818 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 14394 points | |
| Aid | ||
Similar to the CPU, the GPU can also utilize its Turbo just to a limited extent over longer periods of time. While there were no frame charge per unit drops in our 60-infinitesimal test with "The Witcher 3" (Full-Hd, Ultra), effectually 1544 MHz is meager for a GTX 1070 (bones clock speed: 1443 MHz, maximum clock speed: 1860 MHz).
The Witcher iii ultra
The relatively small reward to the Max-Q competitors can be explained accordingly. In the Fire-Strike test of 3DMark, the Razer Blade xv, the Gigabyte Aero 15X, and the MSI GS65 are merely 4-10% slower. The GL504GS noticeably surpasses the GTX-1060 notebooks: in the instance of the Schenker XMG Neo fifteen it is a plus of 41%.
The GeForce GTX 1070 is also non agape of the current games. Even extremely enervating games such as "Concluding Fantasy 15" tin can exist played smoothly in their native resolution – at maximum graphics settings, of course. In less calculating-intensive games (such as "Destiny two" and "Fortnite") information technology often reaches more than than 100 FPS, allowing the 144-Hz panel to prove its capabilities.
The ample prototype refresh rate likewise shows its positive influence outside the fast 3D programs, and you tin can even notice the advantages of the technology in regular desktop programs (smooth mouse pointer).
Currently, noise-sensitive users are non really well-served by gaming notebooks. as with its competitors, the ROG Strix is also quite loud under load. At 51 dB(A) during "The Witcher three," the test unit positions itself between the Razer Blade 15 (49 dB(A)) and the XMG Neo xv (53 dB(A)), with the Gigabyte Aero 15X producing an identical value. But the MSI GS65 runs noticeably quieter (42 dB(A)).
During idle, the GL504 does not leave a particularly bully impression either. Even though an average of 33 dB(A) is quite low, the arrangement sometimes revs up unnecessarily and tends to some whistling in detail situations or load scenarios. In addition, the fans are never completely deactivated. As previously mentioned, we created our measurements in the Balanced mode, and the Silent option might ensure more than relaxation.
Racket Level
| Idle | 32 / 33 / 40 dB(A) | |
| Load | 49 / 53 dB(A) | |
 | ||
| 30 dB 40 dB(A) 50 dB(A) | ||
| min: | ||
, med: 
, max: 
| Asus GL504GS GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H | Razer Blade 15 2018 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Schenker XMG Neo fifteen GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dissonance | 7% | 3% | 10% | -2% | 12% | |
| off / environment * | 29 | 29 -0% | 29 -0% | 30 -3% | 29 -0% | 24.viii ? 14% |
| Idle Minimum * | 32 | 29 9% | 30 6% | 30 6% | 29 9% | 26.4 ? 17% |
| Idle Average * | 33 | thirty nine% | 31 6% | 31 6% | 35 -half dozen% | 28.3 ? 14% |
| Idle Maximum * | 40 | 38 5% | 35 12% | 34 fifteen% | 40 -0% | 32.7 ? 18% |
| Load Boilerplate * | 49 | 46 6% | 49 -0% | 43 12% | 50 -two% | 45.2 ? 8% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 51 | 49 4% | 51 -0% | 42 18% | 53 -4% | |
| Load Maximum * | 53 | 46 13% | 54 -2% | 44 17% | 58 -ix% | 53.1 ? -0% |
* ... smaller is better
We had mixed feelings about the temperatures. While the Scar II remained on the level of the competitors nether load, in idle mode the example surface heated up more than than in the other thin-bezel gaming notebooks. The primary reason is the lack of graphics switching, causing the dedicated Nvidia scrap to run continuously and produce estrus accordingly.
In 3D performance, the components get very hot in full general. A maximum of 88 °C (~190 °F) for the GPU and upwardly to 97 °C (~207 °F) for the CPU later on a sixty-minute stress examination using the FurMark and Prime95 tools are borderline. Things look slightly improve in the realistic gaming sessions. During "The Witcher three," the GTX 1070 leveled out at about 85 °C (185 °F). At around 80 °C (176 °F), the Core i7-8750H remained significantly cooler than during total load.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 55 °C = 131 F Average: 44.six °C = 112 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 55 °C = 131 F Average: 46.1 °C = 115 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Power Supply (max.) sixty °C = 140 F | Room Temperature 24 °C = 75 F | Voltcraft IR-900
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 36 °C = 97 F Average: 33.7 °C = 93 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 36 °C = 97 F Average: 32.nine °C = 91 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Power Supply (max.) 37 °C = 99 F | Room Temperature 24 °C = 75 F | Voltcraft IR-900
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: fifty °C = 122 F Boilerplate: 41.8 °C = 107 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 52 °C = 126 F Average: 44.1 °C = 111 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Power Supply (max.) 56 °C = 133 F | Room Temperature 24 °C = 75 F | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The boilerplate temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.vi °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of forty.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.ii to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The lesser heats upward to a maximum of 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the boilerplate of 43.two °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the boilerplate temperature for the upper side is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the device boilerplate of 33.ix °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad tin get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37 °C / 98.six F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29.i °C / 84.4 F (-7.9 °C / -14.2 F).
| Asus GL504GS GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H | Razer Bract 15 2018 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Sparse GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Schenker XMG Neo 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | i% | viii% | 15% | four% | 9% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 55 | 56 -two% | 53 iv% | 49 11% | 56 -2% | 47.5 ? 14% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 55 | 59 -7% | 65 -18% | 63 -15% | 68 -24% | 51.8 ? 6% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 36 | 33 viii% | 26 28% | 24 33% | 28 22% | 32.iii ? 10% |
| Idle Bottom * | 36 | 34 6% | 30 17% | 25 31% | 29 nineteen% | 34 ? half dozen% |
* ... smaller is amend
The audio quality of the GL504 turns out surprisingly good. The speakers, which are positioned at the sides, produce a very powerful audio. You will simply observe such a total bass foundation in very few gaming notebooks, especially in the slim segment. For a laptop, the mids and highs are also quite accurate and clear.
The use of headphones is therefore not a requirement for the ROG Strix, and movies, games, and songs already sound good using the on-board speakers. Thanks to the preinstalled Audio Tools, you tin configure the audio if y'all like and adjust it for various scenarios.
Frequency diagram (checkboxes tin be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus GL504GS audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but adept (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | skillful bass - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (seven.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - simply 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only four.six% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (four.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.vii% divergence to median)
Compared to aforementioned form
» half-dozen% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of vi%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was twenty%, worst was 65%
Razer Blade xv 2018 sound assay
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.one% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (v.vi% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs two - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (half dozen.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - sixteen.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.half dozen% difference to median)
Compared to same form
» 72% of all tested devices in this course were ameliorate, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were amend, 8% similar, 45% worse
» The all-time had a delta of 3%, boilerplate was 20%, worst was 65%
The lack of Nvidia's Optimus technology not only has negative consequences for the temperature and noise development, just too for the power consumption and bombardment life. At 29-38 watts during idle, the 15-incher has a relatively high ability consumption. The competitors use mostly less than 20 watts here. In 3D operation, the Asus GL504 also moves by the comparison notebooks, drawing 100-217 watts from the outlet instead of 91-182 watts.
| Asus GL504GS GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H | Razer Blade 15 2018 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Schenker XMG Neo 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 31% | 31% | 38% | 39% | 21% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 29 | 14 52% | fourteen 52% | 7 76% | 10 66% | 14.i ? 51% |
| Idle Average * | 32 | 17 47% | xviii 44% | 11 66% | 13 59% | 18.7 ? 42% |
| Idle Maximum * | 38 | 21 45% | 22 42% | 20 47% | 18 53% | 26.vi ? 30% |
| Load Average * | 100 | 95 5% | 91 9% | 98 2% | 95 5% | 111.5 ? -12% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 170 | 141 17% | 142 xvi% | 132 22% | 114 33% | |
| Load Maximum * | 217 | 179 18% | 173 20% | 182 16% | 179 18% | 227 ? -5% |
* ... smaller is better
The biggest weakness of the GL504GS is its low bombardment life. Graphics switching capabilities would vastly improve the mobility. While the MSI GS65 and the Razer Bract fifteen concluding for almost vi hours in our Wi-Fi test at medium effulgence, the Scar 2 can only manage 2.5 hours. The distance to the Gigabyte Aero 15X, which lasts nigh viii.5 hours without a charger during internet surfing, is even larger. Fifty-fifty the XMG Neo 15 which is equipped with a weak 46-Wh battery (the competitors are provided with 66-94 Wh) can manage 4.v hours, which is not bad.
Under load, the ROG Strix is already on its last breath afterwards about 1 60 minutes. The 3D operation drops significantly during battery functioning. "The Witcher 3" is brought to the screen between twoscore and 70% slower (xviii-32 vs. 56 FPS @FHD/Ultra).
Battery Runtime
| Idle (without WLAN, min brightness) | 2h 56min | |
| WiFi Websurfing | 2h 26min | |
| Big Cadet Bunny H.264 1080p | 2h 30min | |
| Load (maximum brightness) | 1h 11min |
| Asus GL504GS GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, 66 Wh | Razer Blade 15 2018 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 80 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 94.24 Wh | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 82 Wh | Schenker XMG Neo 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, 46.7 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 89% | 235% | 122% | 89% | 140% | |
| Reader / Idle | 176 | 382 117% | 762 333% | 507 188% | 400 127% | 594 ? 238% |
| H.264 | 150 | 324 116% | 504 236% | 356 137% | 288 92% | 374 ? 149% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 146 | 322 121% | 513 251% | 362 148% | 262 79% | 360 ? 147% |
| Load | 71 | 72 ane% | 156 120% | 81 14% | 111 56% | 89 ? 25% |
Pros
+ very responsive 144-Hz panel
+ NVMe-SSD + SSHD
+ good input devices
+ very fast WLAN
+ RGB illumination
+ powerful sound
+ powerful tools
+ thin bezels
Cons
- unfortunate positioning of the webcam
- limited CPU and GPU Turbo
- high dissonance level under load
- neither Optimus nor G-Sync
- weak battery life
- no Thunderbolt 3
In the segment of slim gaming laptops having a thin-bezel blueprint, nosotros tin see the beginnings of a tough competition. After the Gigabyte Aero 15X and the Razer Blade 15 were already able to convince united states of america almost completely in the last few months, with the Asus ROG Strix GL504 Scar II there is now a 3rd candidate that achieves an overall evaluation of 87% or 88%.
The xv-incher owes its high pct in the evaluation not but to the stylish case with the 144-Hz screen, just likewise to its skilful input devices and the surprisingly voluminous audio of the speakers.
On the other hand, it is questionable why Asus has chosen a regular GeForce GTX 1070 instead of the Max-Q version. Although the standard model brings slightly more than power, as a result the emissions, the instance height and the weight suffer, turning out better with the competitors in most cases.
Withal, in do, the lack of graphics switching is even more of a problem. Without the Optimus technology, it becomes difficult to consider the GL504GS a mobile gaming platform, since buyers will be very dependent on the power supply (according to Asus, at to the lowest degree the GL504GM with a GTX 1060 is supposed to support Optimus). The manufacturer could too make some improvements in terms of the connections. In 2018, nosotros practise expect a Thunderbolt 3 port in the price range above 1000 Euros (~$1139).
Despite these deficits, the fifteen-incher can surpass the MSI GS65 whose instance shows several weaknesses. And at the end of the day, the Schenker XMG Neo 15 also loses out against it.
Asus GL504GS - 2018-08-21 08/21/2018 v6(old)
Florian Glaser
Gaming - Weighted Boilerplate
Pricecompare
Computers always had an of import identify in my life, starting with an Intel 80286 microprocessor in the early 1990s. I became interested in the productive side of technology, peculiarly in campus radio, while studying at TU Chemnitz and during a trainee program in Belfast. Hardware interests led me to manage Notebookjournal.de, which is now a partitioning of Notebooksbilliger, for a few years. I became cocky-employed in 2010 and took the adjacent logical stride in my career by starting to write for Notebookcheck.
Florian Glaser, 2018-08-21 (Update: 2019-02-27)
Asus Rog Strix Gtx 1070 Laptop,
Source: https://www.notebookcheck.net/Asus-ROG-Strix-GL504-Scar-II-i7-8750H-GTX-1070-FHD-Laptop-Review.322858.0.html
Posted by: trexlerthabod.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Asus Rog Strix Gtx 1070 Laptop"
Post a Comment