Ryzen 3000 Ddr4 3200 Vs 3600

Is there any difference betwixt 3200, 3333, and 3600 RAM speeds?

In that location is a lot of info on the Internet, that RAM speed is crucial for PC operation. So I decided on my own to check this. I already had 2 kits: Yard.Skill DDR4 16GB 2x8GB 3200MHz Trident Z RGB (F4–3200C16D-16GTZR) and HyperX DDR4 16GB 2x8GB 3333MHz Predator Black (HX433C16PB3K2/16). The next step was to find something faster, and then I picked up G.Skill DDR4 16GB 2x8GB 3600MHz Trident Z NEO RGB (F4–3600C16D-16GTZNC).

My setup: AMD Ryzen v 3600 s-AM4 3.6GHz/32MB BOX CPU and Asus ROG STRIX B450-I Gaming s-AM4 B450 Motherboard.

The first kit was the 3200 MHz kit. We will use it every bit a standard for all next measurements. I checked information technology in Cinebench R23, Geekbench v, and Counter-Strike test.

The side by side kit was the 3333 MHz kit and the same tests. Every bit we can meet in that location is non much comeback. Besides, some synthetic tests are fifty-fifty worse like multi-core functioning in Geekbench 5 and Counter-Strike boilerplate FPS.

I was worried nearly the adjacent kit due to not having the all-time results in the previous test. Let's check the scores for the 3600 MHz.

Results aren't impressive at all and in some areas are worse. It led me to tighten up the timings or in other words RAM overclocking.

I started from the condom config and it led to the best scores in Cinebench 5.

I decided to try fast config and information technology went even better.

Results were much better in synthetic benchmarks simply the gaming functioning was near the same. In a decision, in that location is non much deviation for gaming to pay for something, which is faster than 3200 MHz. But the synthetic tests for ciphering work were better at 3600 MHz subsequently tightening upwards timings, so it could exist worth extra bucks.

P.S. I think RAM overclocking for the 3200 kit could achieve like results equally we got for the 3600 kit.